Cleaning and working on the finish of my '82 Spider 2000--all original paint--deep navy blue (449). Car has been clay barred and polished (medium and fine). The next step is either two stage deep wax or ceramic coating. The the original paint appears to be in good condition, so I feel its a good candidate for either treatment. I don't mind waxing my spider a couple of times a year--so I lean that way. I'm intrigued by the potential benefits with ceramic to diminishing water spotting, minor abrasions and "swirls", given the very dark finish.
Has anyone tried ceramic coatings on original Fiat paint? Welcome any reports and advice on which approach is best for the long term quality of the finish on my spider.
Thanks,
Steve
Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2019 1:32 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Fiat Spider 2000
- Location: Annapolis, MD
-
- Posts: 1814
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 11:04 am
- Your car is a: 82 Fiat Spider 2000 CSO
- Location: San Antonio
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
Steve, I have used ceramic products on my other cars. However, I have rested using it on older cars. These ceramic products are supposed to bond to the paint. I've read you can use ceramic coating on auto plastics with no ill effect. These coats last for some time. Even the less expensive products wear well for a couple months before needing to be re-applied. My concern is that if it bonds to paint and wears off then it takes more paint with it because of a bonding process. Not a lot of paint and certainly not anything of any concern when you have a couple layers of modern clear coat. However, most of our cars have some combination of an acrylic lacquer/enamel. These ceramic products were not designed for this type of paint. Many classic car owners have done frame up restores with modern paint. The only folks that may hesitate are those with original paint. I'd put a a good wax on the car until we have more history of the ceramic coating on older paint types.
Buon giro a tutti! - enjoy the ride!
82 Fiat Spider 2000
03 BMW M3
07 Chevy Suburban
82 Fiat Spider 2000
03 BMW M3
07 Chevy Suburban
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2019 1:32 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Fiat Spider 2000
- Location: Annapolis, MD
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
TX82FIAT: I really appreciate your comments and details on ceramics. I decided to stay with wax, and I know the car will look great polished and with the two stage, PS21 wax treatment!
Thanks,
Steve
Thanks,
Steve
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:15 am
- Your car is a: 1981 Fiat Spider 2000
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
I've used both Mcguire's and Griot's sio2 sprays. Both worked shockingly well with no real effort. Do 2 coats. Simply amazing. My arms aren't rubber from wiping off wax. Works like a detail spray. A must try!!!
Current Stable: Lotus Evora, Fiat 2000, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jaguar XF-R
-
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:39 pm
- Your car is a: 1978 124 Spider 1800
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
Ceramic car wax? Anyone have an link or example?
-
Online
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:23 pm
- Your car is a: 1969 and 1971 124 spiders
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
Disclaimer: I have no experience with this product.
https://www.griotsgarage.com/product/ce ... gIFNfD_BwE
Silica (silicon dioxide) is quartz. Normally it doesn't repel water, but it can be treated to be water repellent, kind of the same technology as stuff like Rain-X for your windshield. Apparently ceramic car wax is a wax-based material that has water repellent (hydrophobic) silica nanoparticles dispersed throughout. Kind of a neat idea, actually, as it would both repel water (which can carry dirt) and also has a shiny appearance like glass or crystal.
Maybe I'll find some silica nanoparticles, mix in some Rain-X, and mix it all up with carnuba car wax, and give it a go! Home-brew science in action!
-Bryan
https://www.griotsgarage.com/product/ce ... gIFNfD_BwE
Silica (silicon dioxide) is quartz. Normally it doesn't repel water, but it can be treated to be water repellent, kind of the same technology as stuff like Rain-X for your windshield. Apparently ceramic car wax is a wax-based material that has water repellent (hydrophobic) silica nanoparticles dispersed throughout. Kind of a neat idea, actually, as it would both repel water (which can carry dirt) and also has a shiny appearance like glass or crystal.
Maybe I'll find some silica nanoparticles, mix in some Rain-X, and mix it all up with carnuba car wax, and give it a go! Home-brew science in action!
-Bryan
-
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:39 pm
- Your car is a: 1978 124 Spider 1800
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
I'm going to call BS on ceramic polishes. SiO2 is nothing but sand. An abrasive. There is no such thing as liquid SiO2.
I think this is an old polymer vax combined with fine SiO2 abrasive. Do not rub too hard.
I think this is an old polymer vax combined with fine SiO2 abrasive. Do not rub too hard.
-
Online
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:23 pm
- Your car is a: 1969 and 1971 124 spiders
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
Au contraire, mon Nut124. Google: "water glass" or "sodium silicate".Nut124 wrote:There is no such thing as liquid SiO2.
-Bryan
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:21 pm
- Your car is a: 1978 124 Spider with Isuzu Turbo Diesel
Re: Ceramic Coating vs. Wax
I get a bit concerned when I see Micro or Nano in a product description considering the plague that Micro-Fibers/Particles in our synthetic/plastic fabrics, etc have already brought upon us. Are these Nano Technology products just another clever way we've found to trigger an ELE (Extinction Level Event)?