![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
So, I assume the crank is toast? I guess my only course of action is to rebuild the bottom end? Hmmm that Mazda rotary swap sounds interesting right about now
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
a lot of side to side slop the other two wiggle a bit number 4 is tight."major play in the con rod"
Back when I was traveling down to the Santa Fe area every month or so, I could have tossed a 1438 crank in my checked luggage and given you a good price with no shipping! Try that today with airport security being what it is, and I'm not flying to NM much any more.70spider wrote:If I need, I might be able to source a 1438 crank for a good price.
Your skills may be just fine. I did the first rebuild of my 1438 engine back in the late 1970s, in a dark and damp basement with a dirt floor and a wood-burning stove in the corner. I used plastigage at the time, but I have found that you have to keep everything perfectly motionless otherwise the plastigage tends to "smear", making it look wider than it really is, and that translates into a false reading of a tighter clearance than it really is. Hard to keep everything motionless as you torque down the caps.70spider wrote:As for the cause of the bearing issue perhaps my own skills were at fault. It is the first engine I have rebuilt and I just used the plastigauge instead of a micrometer to check the con rod and main tolerances. Unfortunately I do not have easy access to a machinist so I am on my own.
is that for bearing clearance?For Fiat rods, I believe the clearance spec is 0.0015" to 0.0025", but I imagine you could get away with 0.003" or slightly higher. 0.004" or 0.005" is too much clearance.
I studied up on using the plastigauge that is why I took two reading from each journal.but I have found that you have to keep everything perfectly motionless otherwise the plastigage tends to "smear", making it look wider than it really is, and that translates into a false reading of a tighter clearance than it really is.
It's worth a try, perhaps using a heavier oil like 10W-40 or 20W-50 if you aren't already.70spider wrote:Maybe it is fuel washing past the rings causing the low oil pressure at idle. I had just changed it a couple of weeks ago. The timing and carb are better now, perhaps I will just button him up add new oil and pray.
Did you ever remove any of the con rod caps to take a look at the bearings?
That is what I was thinking, running 10W30 at the moment, I run 15W40 diesel oil in my '66 Ford and it works well so I might give it a try.It's worth a try, perhaps using a heavier oil like 10W-40 or 20W-50 if you aren't already.
New pistons, rings and bored 0.4 mm over. He doesn't smoke but he does run rich. New fuel pump but it has been setting for two years and ethanol fuel eats the diaphragms up. The fuel pump is my next check item, they are a pain to get off with the intake on.You can also get gas in the oil if the engine is running rich, but it would take a while unless the engine is running way too rich. When you rebuilt the engine, did you put in new piston rings, and were the cylinders honed so the new rings can "seat" properly?